Comparative study of postoperative stability between conventional orthognathic surgery and a surgery-first orthognathic approach after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for skeletal class III correction
마득현, 김수관, 오지수, 유재식, 정서윤, 김원기, Yu Kyung-Hwan,
소속 상세정보
마득현 ( Mah Deuk-Hyun ) - Chosun University School of Dentistry Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
김수관 ( Kim Su-Gwan ) - Chosun University School of Dentistry Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
오지수 ( Oh Ji-Su ) - Chosun University School of Dentistry Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
유재식 ( You Jae-Seek ) - Chosun University School of Dentistry Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
정서윤 ( Jung Seo-Yun ) - Chosun University School of Dentistry Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
김원기 ( Kim Won-Gi ) - Chosun University School of Dentistry Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
( Yu Kyung-Hwan ) - Chosun University School of Dentistry Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
KMID : 0355620170430010023
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare the postoperative stability of conventional orthognathic surgery to a surgery-first orthognathic approach after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO).
Materials and Methods: The study included 20 patients who underwent BSSRO for skeletal class III conventional orthognathic surgery and 20 patients who underwent a surgery-first orthognathic approach. Serial lateral cephalograms were analyzed to identify skeletal changes before surgery (T0), immediately after surgery (T1), and after surgery (T2, after 1 year or at debonding).
Results: The amount of relapse of the mandible in the conventional orthognathic surgery group from T1 to T2 was 2.23±0.92 mm (P<0.01) forward movement and ?0.87±0.57 mm (non-significant, NS) upward movement on the basis of point B and 2.54±1.37 mm (P<0.01) forward movement and ?1.18±0.79 mm (NS) upward movement on the basis of the pogonion (Pog) point. The relapse amount of the mandible in the surgery-first orthognathic approach group from T1 to T2 was 3.49±1.71 mm (P<0.01) forward movement and ?1.78±0.81 mm (P<0.01) upward movement on the basis of the point B and 4.11±1.93 mm (P<0.01) forward movement and ?2.40±0.98 mm (P<0.01) upward movement on the basis of the Pog.
Conclusion: The greater horizontal and vertical relapse may appear because of counter-clockwise rotation of the mandible in surgery-first orthognathic approach. Therefore, careful planning and skeletal stability should be considered in orthognathic surgery.
키워드
Deformity; Prognathism
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
등재저널 정보